The phrase "categorical for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used to indicate something that is absolute or without question. Example: "The evidence presented was categorical for the defendant's guilt." In this sentence, "categorical for" suggests that the evidence presented was completely and unquestionably in favor of the defendant's guilt.
In other religions Eastern, ancient, and those of nonliterate cultures such intermediate beings are less categorical, for they may be benevolent in some circumstances and malevolent in others.
Both of these positions are too categorical for the issue at hand.
This formulation makes intelligible what is superficially paradoxical in Bradley, when he says: 'All judgments are categorical, for they all do affirm about the reality, and assert their content of that.
Mean difference for quantitative variables and odds ratio for categorical, for significant comparisons.
For the term disability, both categorical (for example: physical disability) and functional definitions (for example: spinal cord injuries), were used.
Analyzed data format was binary for gender, categorical for the FEE items as well as age groups, and continuous for the latent variables (factors, scales).
Table 2 gives the mean or percentage for categorical variables for all independent variables.
(Of course most complete theories are not κ-categorical for any κ.) This question of Łoś was a tremendous stimulus to research, and it led to a classic paper of Michael Morley in 1965 which showed that Łoś's three possibilities are in fact the only ones.
As a first step, one easily sees from the upward and downward Loewenheim-Skolem theorems that if T is κ-categorical for some κ at least as large as the number of formulas in the language of T, then T must be a complete theory.
Half a century later Zermelo proved that the principles of set theory are "almost" categorical or quasi-categorical: for any two models M1 and M2 of the principles of set theory, either M1 is isomorphic to M2, or M1 is isomorphic to a strongly inaccessible rank of M2, or M2 is isomorphic to a strongly inaccessible rank of M1 (Zermelo 1930).
Unlike retirement, there is no precise definition or easily verifiable marker for determining categorical eligibility for long-term disability benefits.
