Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
A total of 7 and 6 prospective studies in school-age children or adults on cat and dog exposure, respectively, are included in this review and most of these studies suggested an inverse association between cat exposure and asthma and wheezing symptoms.
Children with the highest exposure to cat allergen had lower levels of the antibody IgE (the antibody that apparently triggers allergic reactions and asthma) than did children with an intermediate level of cat exposure, the team reports in the 10 March issue of The Lancet.
Seven case-patients had badger exposure and 1 had cat exposure.
aLogistic regression model adjusted for child's gender, age, dog and cat exposure.
Thirty-five patients with allergic asthma, perennial cat exposure, positive skin prick or intradermal test to standardized cat extract, and undergoing subcutaneous CIT ± other subcutaneous immunotherapy were identified.
While we have suggested intrinsic differences in the groups, one could suggest that these groups are therefore not similar in other ways, unrelated to cat exposure and sensitization.
Similar(45)
Female patients received PEP significantly more often because of cat exposures than did male patients (1,736 vs. 1,053; p<0.0001).
Bites accounted for significantly more PEP because of dog and cat exposures (86.4% vs. 63.3%; p<0.0001) than did scratches or saliva/nervous tissue exposures.
For each age group, except the >85-year age group, female patients received PEP more often from cat exposures and male patients more often from dog exposures.
Children exposed to cats and to dogs in the first two years had lower FeNO, except for cats exposure in LISA.
Severe asthma (present in 12 individuals) was not more likely (OR 3.4 (0.8, 14.9)) among those with high cat allergen exposure (Fel d1), nor among those with exposure to ETS (OR 3.0 (95% CI 0.7 to 12.2)) but those few exposed to cat and ETS were more likely to have severe asthma (OR 18.0 (95% CI 3.2 to 101)).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com