Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The fact is that in very many cases we should stop looking for solutions behind prison bars.
Similar(59)
If this is the case, we should stop obsessively focusing on house size as the only factor which affects our quality of life.
Case 2: If x > q 1 p 1 and y ≤ q 2 p 2, then N 1 > 0 and N 2 ≤ 0. In this case, we should stop harvesting the predator species, but we can harvest the prey species.
Case 1: If x ≤ q 1 p 1 and y > q 2 p 2, then N 1 ≤ 0 and N 2 > 0. In this case, we should stop harvesting the prey species, but we can harvest the predator species.
Case 3: If x ≤ q 1 p 1 and y ≤ q 2 p 2, then N 1 ≤ 0 and N 2 ≤ 0. In this case, we should stop harvesting the predator species and the prey species.
And although at this point it may not be a surprise, that doesn't mean we should stop calling for transparency in these cases.
So it can't be the case that just because something has a supposedly scientific explanation, we should stop believing in it, or we would stop believing in scientific explanations.
We should stop.
We should stop pretending otherwise.
We should stop there.
We should stop this.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com