The show provides a healthy mix of both calculated and happenstance self-portraiture, in some cases revisiting well-known photographs within this context.
On this count we will discuss issues of African ancestry testing as evidence in slavery reparations cases, revisit debates on whether Black Freedman should be allowed into the Cherokee and Seminole Nations, and hear arguments on whether people with genetic links to Jewish groups should have a right of return to Israel.
More than one person, though, is not happy to see this case revisited, and violence ensues.
The (A) case relates to the decision in 1959, whereas the (B) case revisits the same decision in 1969.
This case revisits the events in late 2013 that gave rise to what was at the time the largest breach of confidential data in history.
Alone in some conference room, we review the case, revisit the test results, examine again the X-rays, call a colleague.
The show we were promised, as always, is one of compelling spectacle – and last night it was easy to feel the thrill that every four years comes to new ground – or in last night's case revisits old terrain.
This case revisits decisions made in Grutter v. Bollinger, allowing university admissions officers to consider race and ethnicity when admitting students.
That case revisits a 1988 precedent that let shareholders who claim they were defrauded by false statements in securities filings rely on a "fraud on the market" presumption that stock prices reflected those statements, and not have to show they relied on actual filings.
In some cases, the case studies revisited countries included in the 1999 sample, but the opportunity was also taken to widen the sample by including additional countries.
