Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
"Net discrimination" is the difference between cases given in columns "Ex-offender" and "Non-offender".
We consider the following three cases given in Lemma 4. Case 1. Supposing, we consider the objective function in (25).
In combination with the cases given in Table 1, the effect of the Ag templates will be investigated.
Variation of electron fluxes and Kp and Dst indices within selected intervals for other anomaly cases given in Table 4.
This method is then applied to two tudy cases given in the standard to illustrate the use of this merging method.
Now, for each and for the two cases given in (B.1), the right-hand side of (B.6) gives the following: (1) if, then.
Similar(49)
The second case given in Figure 4e,f,g,h does the reverse direction.
The proof for the general case given in [17] uses essentially the same ideas.
The error analysis of the new schemes (21) and (23) are similar to the case given in Section 3.
The proofs are similar to those in the integral case given in the previous section, so we give these results with the proofs omitted.
The proofs are similar to those in the integral case given in the previous section, so we will state these results without the proofs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com