cases for

USAGE SUMMARY

"cases for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to a set of arguments or situations that support your point of view. For example, "In this essay I will present a number of cases for why we should reform our healthcare system."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

cases for nearly 30 years.

The New York Times

But who will select cases for trial?

The Economist

SAC settles insider trading cases for $616 million.

The New York Times

Require business cases for all new projects.

Harvard Business Review

Worked on federal cases for the Hon.

Cornell University

This compares with 346.3 cases for women nationally over that period and 501.2 cases for men.

The New York Times

The department had been investigating the cases for six months.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

The case for inflation.

The New Yorker

The Case for Case.

University of California, Berkeley

Dossier not case for war".

Independent

A Case for OS-Friendly Hardware Accelerators.

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cases for", ensure that you clearly articulate the points or arguments you are trying to make. Provide sufficient evidence and reasoning to support each case.

Common error

Avoid presenting vague or unsubstantiated "cases for". Instead, focus on specific examples and well-defined scenarios to make your arguments more persuasive and credible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cases for" functions as a prepositional phrase often used to introduce arguments, reasons, or justifications supporting a specific claim or idea. It serves to highlight the evidence or rationale behind a particular position. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is appropriate for use in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cases for" is a versatile and commonly used prepositional phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. It functions to introduce arguments, reasons, or justifications in support of a specific claim. Predominantly found in "News & Media", "Science" and "Academic" contexts, it maintains a neutral register, making it suitable for diverse writing styles. When employing "cases for", clear articulation and sufficient evidence are crucial for persuasive communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

support for

Highlights evidence or resources to justify a topic.

arguments supporting

Focuses on the justification and evidence presented.

defense of

Highlights the evidence for a specific topic.

reasons advocating

Highlights the motivations behind a particular viewpoint.

advocacy for

Highlights active public support for a cause.

justifications defending

Emphasizes the act of vindicating or protecting an idea.

arguments in favor of

More elaborate and formal version with the same meaning.

grounds upholding

Implies a foundation upon which something is maintained.

rationale behind

Focuses on the logical explanation or reasoning for something.

basis promoting

Indicates a foundation for encouraging or advancing a cause.

FAQs

How can I use "cases for" in a sentence?

You can use "cases for" to introduce a list of reasons or arguments that support a particular viewpoint. For instance, "Let's examine the "arguments for" and against the proposed policy."

What are some alternatives to using "cases for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "reasons for", "arguments supporting", or "justifications for".

Is it more appropriate to use "cases for" or "case for"?

"Cases for" is used when there are multiple arguments or instances being presented, while "case for" is used when discussing a single, unified argument or situation.

What's the difference between "cases for" and "examples of"?

"Cases for" usually implies a persuasive argument or justification, whereas "examples of" simply provides instances or illustrations without necessarily making an argument. They can be similar but it depends on the intention of the author.