Exact(2)
Table 2 Comparison of EDUGA dating with RGA EDUGA (no fetal pole excluded) EDUGA (all cases) Discrepancy with RGA,days, median (IQR) 2 (1 to 3.25) 3 (1 to 4) Correlation coefficient (95% CI) 0.978 (0.965 to 0986 0.945 0.90909 to 0.966) P value p < 0.005 p < 0.005 IQR, interquartile range; CI, confidence interval.
In these three cases, discrepancy between self-reported and measured weight was not adjusted for, suggesting that weight maintenance may have been over-estimated for these programs.
Similar(58)
In some cases, discrepancies in results are being reported from different laboratories that are studying the same gene knockout model.
In all cases, discrepancies were resolved by discussion or further analysis until consensus was achieved.
In three cases, discrepancies were determined by discussion between the two reviewers and a third reviewer.
In rare cases, discrepancies will be seen where genetic events converge to give identical types in unrelated strains.
In some cases, discrepancies were evident between mappings of national classifications with the international standard, particularly with regard to the nursing and midwifery specializations.
In the second case, discrepancies are attributed to transmission paths not accounted for in the prediction such as flanking transmission via pipes.
In cases of discrepancy, the same evaluation was performed again until repeatable results were obtained.
Several cases of discrepancy type IIa are observed in the dataset.
In cases of discrepancy, the cores were reassessed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com