Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
The corresponding probability of A1C ≥6.5% among diabetic case subjects based on an OGTT was 43.5%.
The probability of an A1C ≥6.5% among diabetic case subjects based on an OGTT was calculated.
The restenosis diagnosis was made in 100 case subjects based on the lack of wound healing, with or without pain, and in 27 case subjects based on the reappearance of resting pain without a foot lesion.
Control subjects were matched to case subjects based on age, sex, clinic site, calendar year, and duration of follow-up.
Six studies (1999 2009) from Denmark, the U.K., Australia, Greenland, Kenya, and India were tested for the probability of an A1C ≥6.5% among diabetic case subjects based on an OGTT.
We identified, at random, for each incident diabetes case subject up to four control patients from the study population who did not develop diabetes, and we matched these control subjects to case subjects based on age (±3 years), sex, and calendar time.
Similar(53)
Four type 2 diabetes control subjects were matched to each case subject based on age, sex, and index date for the corresponding case.
The majority were population-based or hospital-based case control studies, but some studies selected subjects based on age or oversampled for cases with a family history or bilateral disease.
For reasons of efficiency, the case-cohort approach was chosen (weighting of study subjects based on Prentice's method) (Prentice, 1986).
Each case subject was matched with four control subjects based on age and sex.
pr(case) is the probability that the subject is a case based on the proportional hazards model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com