In case of discrepancy, data were returned for verification and correction.
In case of discrepancy between the first and second measurements, a third measurement was then performed.
In case of discrepancy between these two readers, a second nuclear medicine physician (WB) was involved for a final decision.
In the case of discrepancy, the output of the system keeps the previous value, therefore avoiding the propagation of incorrect inputs.
Figure 6 shows a similar case of discrepancy in actual construction as verified by logging and the driller's recorded screen settings of a fully constructed borehole.
The final localization was based on agreement between the two readers by a consensus read, in case of discrepancy after the first read.
In the case of discrepancy (i.e. >30%), a third microscopist reviewed the slides and the principal investigator made the final classification.
In case of discrepancy, a third investigator analysed the examination.
In case of discrepancy, definitive scoring was obtained by consensus.
In case of discrepancy, a consensus was reached after discussion.
In case of discrepancy, a third cDNA clone was sequenced.
