Sentence examples for case in appendix from inspiring English sources

The non-linearity of the equations associated with the problem solution (as explained for the corresponding single user case in Appendix XV), coupled with the task of assigning sub-carriers to the multiple users, make the problem extremely complex.

Following the same procedure as in the LTPC case in Appendix 2: optimal solution of P ̆ ∗ for LTPC, we can apply the necessary and sufficient KKT conditions and the fact that the fading channel state is continuous, use the opportunistic scheduling structure in (25) and arrive at the optimal power policy summarized in Theorem 2.

We examine the opposite case in Appendix S1.

No stranded oil occurs in the center, unlike that of a case illustrated in Appendix, where a 7-spot cell typically shows stranded oil if no central flood is applied (Fig. 19b, Row I).

In the more general case addressed in Appendix 2, where the second derivatives are not assumed to be constant, the left side of (10) must be positive and sufficiently large to guarantee the existence of a stable fixed point, where the lower bound Δ for "sufficiently large" is close to zero if (f"_{a}) and (f"_{b}) are nearly constant over most of the distribution (P r;a,b)).

The only difference with a QAM signal resides in the cumulant of the symbol sequence, which must be computed for PAM symbols through (16) and (17) (see the binary PAM case in the appendix).

This was also a theoretical result [ 11] explained through a simple case in the Appendix and qualitatively congruent with previous data from various laboratories showing the conservation of voluntary arm postural and hand paths [ 9, 10, 19- 21] in the face of highly variable timing and different loads applied to the arm.

The SP assessment sheet for each case is included with the case scenario in Appendices 1 3.

Characteristics of complete and incomplete cases are in appendix 2. The AUC for satisfaction with pain relief during labour for all randomised women was lower in the remifentanil group (difference −2.8, 95% confidence interval −6.9 to 1.3).

An example of a case is described in Appendix III.

The correlated case is discussed in Appendix B. Adaptation of the above algorithm to the semi-blind case where we have some known pilot symbols is straightforward.