Sentence examples for case holds that from inspiring English sources

The half-full case holds that Sainsbury's isn't actually paying anything like that amount.

The third case holds that architecture is not needed but that engineers must think about how to make the structure beautiful.

That case holds that state statutes that deny welfare benefits to resident aliens, or to aliens not meeting a requirement of durational residence within the United States, violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and encroach upon the exclusive federal power over the entrance and residence of aliens.

That case holds that, in general, a court of equity has no jurisdiction of a bill to stay criminal proceedings, but it expressly states an exception, 'unless they are instituted by a party to the suit already pending before it, and to try the same right that is in issue there.' Various authorities are cited to sustain the exception.

In addition to being mindful of the IRA attribution rules when considering a 'backdoor' Roth IRA conversion, one must also consider the step-transaction-doctrine. The step-transaction doctrine, which arose from a Supreme Court case, holds that a court can invalidate a transaction if the separate steps involved in the transaction have no independent substantial business purpose.

Brady v. Maryland, a landmark 1963 case, held that theConstitution requires the prosecution to turn overfavorable evidence to the defense.

At least one American case, holding that English libel law is repugnant to U.S. constitutional standards, refused to enforce a London libel judgment.

Mr. Justice Field alone dissented from the opinion in that case, holding that, as it is insisted here, there should be a specific charge of a conspiracy to do something affecting the election of the federal officer.

In 2000, Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler of Federal District Court in Santa Ana, Calif., dismissed the case, holding that Suzuki could not prove that the magazine had acted with actual malice, the legal term for intentional or reckless fabrication.

On Wednesday, a Montana federal judge denied Anglin's motion to dismiss the case, holding that speech in encouraging anti-Semitic harassment was not entitled to First Amendment protection.

Google then takes it one step further, citing a case holding that "if any investigation is required to determine whether material is infringing, then those facts and circumstances are not red-flags".