The phrase "case for changing" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to the reasons or evidence that support the idea or need for making a change. Eg: "There is a strong case for changing our current sales strategy in order to increase profits."
"For example, both the British Medical Association and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists have said they do not believe there is a case for changing the time limits for abortion". He said that the government had "no plans" to change the law on abortion.
But there may well be a case for changing them".
However, there is no case for changing the rule for rape cases alone.
Much has been written about the moral case for changing Australia's policy response to boat arrivals.
Opponents of a law can make the case for changing it on policy grounds, but even suggesting that these tragic circumstances might strengthen the case for changing that law sets a breathtakingly irresponsible and dangerous precedent.
There is a case to be made and the CBI has made a powerful case for changing the law.
For the optimization method, we propose the use of a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the type-2 fuzzy inference systems, considering different cases for changing the level of uncertainty of the membership functions to reach the optimal solution at the end.
There has been a case made for changing the law but that is not the way we want to go.
Francis Maude, the cabinet office minister, said he had previously warned that the more union leaders "pushed for disruptive strike action without even persuading a majority of their members to vote, the stronger the case would become for changing the law".
"But I've also warned that the more that union leaders pushed for disruptive strike action without even persuading a majority of their members to vote, the stronger the case would become for changing the law".
From Figs. 7 a and 8 a, we can see that the transmission efficiency (around 0.7 in the stable value, i.e., for large N) of EPC Variant II is a little higher than that of AFSA2 (around 0.66 in the stable value), while EPC Variant I performs very poor (its transmission efficiency is around 0.4 at large N for the case of changing Δ and below 0.2 at large N for the case of constant Δ).
