Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Case advancement questions are questions that advance the story or theme but do not have a cognitive aim, per se.
R1: "It's an opinion…" R4: "This almost seems like a case advancement".
When Rater Team participants initially looked at the question, some called it a case advancement question.
Rather, they serve the purpose of engaging or surveying students: R4: "This almost seems like a case advancement".
R4: "Yeah, exactly, opinion…" R5: "But I mean with athletes when you get low…I think 15% [body fat]…they stop menstruating…" Later in the same discussion another Rater Team participant explained why she thought this was a case advancement question.
P.P.L.: "OK, so what is the order [answer] you would have chosen?" R1: "I would have chosen A, D, B, C…" P.P.L.: "…if that were one of the options, would that have affected your rating of the question?" R1: "I still think it's probably case advancement.
I understand what you were saying [addressing a participant who rated the question higher order] about 'making a determination,' but to me, these are too gray, and there's not one right answer…" In the end, five of seven Rater Team participants rated this question as case advancement.
In some cases, advancements in technology have forced different branches of the military to develop competing or superior weaponry, but more often than not the armed services have molded technology to suit their own purposes, remaining resilient in the face of technological challenges.
Most importantly, these AKI-specific scoring systems have not shown adequate discrimination or calibration ability possibly due to significant differences in case mix, advancements in ICU care, and changes in AKI definition over years [ 21, 22].
But Supple's shortcomings on the Olivier stage this year won't further his case for advancement.
Without specific, documented business accomplishments, it is difficult for a manager to make the case for advancement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com