Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
The Office for National Statistics ONS Longitudinal Studydy (LS), which is a 1% sample of linked census data, allows us to follow-up informal carers from the 2001 Census in order to examine their caring activity ten years later.
Perhaps childrearing and other caring activity is both work and play, but only that portion which is necessary for the psychological growth of the child and the worker(s) counts as work.
A previous study that estimated the value of lost household production and caring activity due to premature mortality across multiple cancer sites reported a doubling of costs due to the addition of non-market activity lost to market-activity [ 8].
In terms of potential limitations, our estimates for lost household production and caring activity were based on reported time use in 2005 in the general population as no equivalent estimates exist for the cancer population.
In recognition of the fact that individuals also engage in a range of non-market activities, the loss of which through premature cancer-related mortality also represents an economic loss to society, we estimated costs of potential household production and caring activity lost.
To enable comparison with previous studies which address the question of whether carers with low levels of caring activity are healthier than those who do no caring we compare the proportions of carers and non-carers with poor or fair health.
Similar(53)
The specific caring activities and caring times of the caregivers are shown in Table 2.
Fig. 2 Stacked bar chart with the different mentioned abundances of caring activities.
Caregiver expresses feelings of distress, anger, or depression/is unable to continue caring activities.
It shares summary records on GP, secondary care and social care activity, along with integrated care crisis plans and recently-added end-of-life plans.
Each activity (especially each care activity) can be described according to its potential risks and expected results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com