Exact(41)
Having no prenatal care was associated with increased likelihood of nonuse of postpartum care (adjusted relative risk 3.39, CI 1.98-5.81).
Farrell et al. (2014) reported that personnel in accident and emergency (Adjusted OR 4.27; 95% CI 2.47 7.39), aged care (adjusted OR 3.33; 95% CI 2.22 5.00) and psychiatric or mental health departments (adjusted OR 4.09; 95% CI 2.41 6.95) were significantly more likely to be assaulted in comparison to other settings.
We did however find a significantly increased risk of any resistance among new patients who had a history of having worked in health care (adjusted odds ratio 3.5 95% CI 1.0 12.2; p = 0.045).
Results of age and health care adjusted stratified analyses for cIMT are shown in Figure 1.
*Difference in improvement between integrated care and usual care adjusted for stratum and type of hospital.
Women in intervention communes more frequently attended antenatal care (adjusted odds ratio 2.27 [95% CI 1.07-4.8].
Similar(19)
[ 26, 27] Logistic regression models assessed the relationship between death and patterns of care, adjusting for covariates (listed below).
Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between operative delivery and type of care, adjusting for potential confounding factors.
Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether HL and perceived access to and coordination of care were associated with satisfaction with care received in primary care adjusting for demographics and health status.
The amount of clinical exposure and levels of self-reports of clinical competence, not years after graduation, were positively associated with quality of care, adjusting for the remaining factors.
Logistic regression was used to assess the association between survey response and QOF score (as a proxy for quality of clinical care), adjusting for other characteristics of GPs and their practices (list size, number of partners, geographical region).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com