Suggestions(1)
Exact(46)
The carbon would be stored deep underground.
Carbon would be sucked from the air by the green plants and then forced underground.
More carbon would be saved than re-released into the atmosphere, the theory goes, so creating net zero emissions.
(Although if the methanol is used as vehicle fuel, the carbon would be released back into the environment, making the process carbon neutral).
Campanale looked at the planet's known fossil-fuel reserves — its savings account, basically — and calculated how much carbon would be released if they were burned.
"Stern [Nicholas Stern, the economist who put climate change on the political agenda] is radically wrong," he added, in arguing that acting now to cut carbon would be cheaper in the long run.
Similar(12)
Finally, it may be concluded that the cotton fiber and paper wastes-derived activated carbons would be a potential and low-cost Hg adsorbing medias in aqueous phase.
Moreover, all the glycyl bridge methylene carbons would be less than about 5 Å from l-alanyl methyl carbons, which is inconsistent with measured distances (cf. below).
And then through the different cycles with photosynthesis, like carbon fixation, the carbon dioxide would be turned into sugars and so that would be the increase in mass.
In both cases the value of forest carbon stock would be pegged to carbon market prices.
In the last article you suggest that a carbon tax would be the best way to reduce carbon emissions, because "A tax would be the better option.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com