Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(16)
The carbon capture rate is set to 90%.
The carbon capture rate of the CLOU systems is almost total (>99%).
The carbon capture rate of evaluated concepts is almost total (>99%).
The carbon capture rate is set to be at least 90%.
The economically most beneficial and efficient cases were evaluated identifying target values for carbon capture rate and plant efficiency.
Reforming-based glycerol processing concepts with CO2 capture based on gas liquid absorption have significantly lower energy efficiency (55 65%) and carbon capture rate (57 70%).
Similar(43)
Results show fair predictions of hydrodynamics, heat transfer, and carbon capture rates with significant savings in computational runtimes.
Carbon capture rates up to and over 90% were achieved with full-scale Polaris™ modules in individual trials that ran up to 1800 h.
Finally, it is shown how optimal carbon capture and electricity production rate profiles for an energy plant such as the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant are affected by electricity demand and price fluctuations under different carbon tax scenarios.
This index of carbon input to wetland vegetation suggests that rates of carbon capture by emergent aboveground vegetation and submerged aquatic vegetation were similar in constructed and reference areas.
Therefore, although productivity of emergent and submerged vegetation in constructed and reference areas was similar, the smaller ratio of land to water in the constructed areas reduced their annual rate of plant carbon capture at a larger spatial scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com