Exact(3)
The size of the capsule prepared by standard recipe was around 300 nm and the polydispersity index was 0.024 representing that size distribution was highly monodisperse.
The capsule prepared from sodium cellulose sulfate (NaCS) and polydimethyl-diallyl-ammonia chloride (PDMDAAC) was used to coencapsulate the osmotolerant yeast Candida krusei and PEG4000 for the production of glycerol.
The flexibility of the capsule wall even in the presence of a cross-linker is impressively illustrated in Fig. 11b showing a capsule prepared with one third cross-linker in the amine mixture.
Similar(57)
Figure 3 TEM images of the samples: a carbon hollow spheres prepared at 400 °C; b carbon hollow capsules prepared at 480 °C; c carbon solid spheres prepared at 600 °C; d HRTEM image of the carbon hollow capsules prepared at 480 °C.
Mixed-oxide test capsules prepared with weapons-derived plutonium have been irradiated to a burnup of 50 GWd/MT.
In vitro drug release from CC self-nanoemulsifying capsules prepared by different Smix ratios were found in the following order: (Smix ratio) 4 1 > 3 1 > 2 1 > 1 1.
The volume mean diameter of formed protein capsules prepared with genipin, alginate and κ-carrageenan was 749.5 ± 2.3 μm, 21.9 ± 1.2 μm and 838.5 ± 31.3 μm, respectively.
Results show that sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is able to promote the release of FL from polymeric capsules prepared with CA with asymmetrical membrane.
Direct observation for the graphite structure of the as-prepared carbon materials can be determined by HRTEM. Figure 3d shows a HRTEM image of the carbon hollow capsules prepared at 480 °C.
In vitro drug release from CC self-nanoemulsifying capsules prepared by different adsorbent mixture was higher for formulations containing avicel 101 with aerosil 200 mixture than formulations adsorbed onto a mixture of avicel 101 plus dibasic calcium phosphate anhydrous mixture.
The study was double-blind, with matching capsules prepared by a pharmacy registered under U.K. Good Manufacturing Practice regulations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com