Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
For instance, real GDP per capita has a significant negative impact on perinatal mortality rates, and education and medical conditions also contribute significantly to promoting economic growth and improving the level of public health.
Loss per capita has a positive coefficient, whereas the intercept and Factors 1 and 3 have negative coefficients.
It is expected that GDP per capita has a positive association with health expenditure per capita due to both the income and substitution effects discussed earlier.
We discover that GDP per capita has a negative relationship with fertility rates and a 1% increase in GDP per capita leads to a decrease in fertility by 2.1%.
As for macroeconomic variables, only the annual growth rate of GDP per capita has a negative and significant impact on the volatility of the returns on assets and equities of banks.
While the results of Model 3 show that Relative GDP per capita has a positive direct impact on immigrants' wages, we are concerned that Relative GDP per capita may be capturing more than a human capital quality effect.
Similar(50)
The estimated model showed that energy prices, energy taxes and GDP (gross domestic product) per capita have a negative influence on energy intensity, while the growth of gross inland consumption and final energy consumption per capita positively affect energy intensity.
States that have higher government expenditure per capita have a lower quality of life.
In general, although there are some exceptions, regions with a low GDP per capita have a relatively high child mortality rate, and vice-versa.
The number of acute care beds per capita had a significant influence on Medicaid caesarean section rates but not on private insurance rates.
As part of the latter contract, which ran from 2012 to 2016, and involved contacting and processing the cases of suspected illegal immigrants, Capita had an "outcome based payment mechanism".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com