Sentence examples for capita destination from inspiring English sources

GDP per capita destination PPP-adjusted GDP per capita in host country at current US$ World Bank (2010): World Development Indicators Database.

The estimated coefficient for GDP per capita at destination, for example, is 0.015 (s.e. 0.005) instead of 0.052 (s.e. 0.023) in Table 5.

As far as macroeconomic indicators are concerned, firstly, real GDP per capita of destination countries exerts positive and significant effect on female migration flow.

Estimated elasticities of GDP per capita in destination countries are around 0.6, slightly smaller but not very different from the average elasticity implied by the coefficients in Table 5.

Table 8 Income per capita of selected destination and original provinces (thousand VND per month)   2006 2010 2010 Destination provinces  Ho Chi Minh City 1480 2192 3653  Dong Nai 867 1318 1763  Binh Duong 1215 1929 2698 Original provinces  Ha Tinh 400 595 840  Thua Thien Hue 517 804 1058  Dak Lak 507 785 1068 Source: Vietnamese General Statistics Office.

The gravity model applied in this study employs nine variables: (1) relative differences in GDP per capita between the destination and the origin country; (2) population in the origin and the destination country; (3) geographical distance between capital cities of origin and destination countries; (4) Urbanization Rate; (5) Contiguity; (7) Network; (8) Landlocked and (9) Area.

As the analysis firstly suggests, per capita differences in destination and origin countries affect volume of migrants positively, meaning that better economic conditions and opportunities in destination countries affect Turkish migrants' decision of emigration positively.

The stock of migrants is positively associated with the GDP per capita of the destination country.

Results in Table 1 reveal that per capita differences in destination and origin countries affect migrant stock positively.

In particular, everything else constant, a 1000$ increase in GDP per capita of the destination country increases the immigrant stock by a 5.2%%.

These coefficients are interpreted as follows: the effect of a 1000$ increase in GDP per capita of the destination country is 0.21 percentage points smaller if the distance from the origin country is a 10percentt larger than the average.