When controlling for domestic levels of GDP per capita and average life satisfaction (column 2 and 4), most coefficients lose magnitude and significance.
The contribution of the per-capita stock of physical capital (K / N) to the growth of per-capita income was 0.61 per year in the baseline (see column I.a), while the per-capita stock of human capital (L / N) contributed around 0.08 per year.
The net effects of changes in nutrient availability caused by an increase in per capita income are listed in the last column of the lower part of table 3.
Column three shows expenditure per capita per PPP, in dollars, with France and Germany spending most (>$3370), with an average for the six countries of $3020 and again the United Kingdom being below this average at $2750.
Finally, FC and blaNDM-1 significantly correlate in the river water column, including periods when per capita blaNDM-1 levels were elevated; therefore, higher blaNDM-1 levels in June are likely associated with greater quantities of visitor fecal matter in the Upper Ganges.
Column (5) shows real GDP per capita with respect to the US.
The direct costs per capita for cancer reflected the above results as column two shows that Germany spent 216 Euros compared with the United Kingdom at 132 Euros; the average being 168 Euros.
The OLS results are presented for comparison in columns (1) and (4) for per capita consumption expenditure and wealth index respectively.
Solitary individuals have greater per capita intake for new unfragmented patches (top of first column in each figure), but have a lower foraging efficiency overall.
Comparing however the country's DALYs per capita across disease groups (comparison across the "country rate" column of the profile) provides an indication of which diseases are the most affected by the environment in the country and points to the greatest prevention opportunities.
