capacity to transact

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "capacity to transact" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to business, finance, or legal discussions where the ability to engage in transactions is being described. Example: "The company must demonstrate its capacity to transact in order to secure the necessary funding for expansion."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

In conclusion, we posit that many eukaryotic loci have evolved the capacity to transact a multitude of overlapping and potentially independent functions as both regulatory and protein-coding RNAs.

Biochimie

Its capacity to transact business is then established, created by the mere presence of a majority, and does not depend upon the disposition or assent or action of any single [144 U.S. 1, 6] member or fraction of the majority present.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

"People could be using the transactions of others to transact illegal business without the knowledge of the owner".

The Guardian

That Palliser came through this period with his reputation enhanced, both in the Foreign Office and with the prime minister, was a sign of his remarkable capacity to pour oil on troubled waters and to transact public business effectively in even the most turbulent and unpromising circumstances.

The Guardian

Consumers should be enabled to transact with others.

The New York Times

There merchants, bankers, and seafarers assembled to transact business informally.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Its economic success encouraged others to transact on its terms.

The Economist

"It's such a new, different way to transact, that education and awareness is key.

The New York Times

Language remains, however, a still partially understood phenomenon used to transact several types of discourse.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"But they are more illiquid to transact in on a day-to-day basis".

The New York Times

So they went behind closed doors for two hours to transact needed business.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing formal agreements or legal authorizations, use "capacity to transact" to clearly indicate the legal or authorized ability to engage in business or other dealings. For instance: "The signed agreement confirms their capacity to transact on behalf of the corporation."

Common error

Avoid using "capacity to transact" when you actually mean the willingness or desire to engage in transactions. "Capacity" refers to the ability or authorization, not the inclination. Instead of "They lack the capacity to transact", consider "They are unwilling to transact" if the issue is about reluctance, not capability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "capacity to transact" functions as a noun phrase acting as the object of a verb or preposition. It indicates the ability or power to engage in transactions, referring to the possession of necessary means, authorization, or legal right to conduct business or dealings. As Ludwig AI suggests, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "capacity to transact" is a grammatically correct phrase denoting the ability or authorization to engage in business or legal transactions. While not very common, it's appropriately used in formal contexts, particularly within scientific or legal domains. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. Alternatives like "ability to transact" or "power to transact" may be suitable depending on the specific context. It's crucial to differentiate between "capacity" (ability) and "willingness" (desire) when using this phrase. Therefore, the phrase must be used in scenarios where legal authorizations are needed in business.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ability to transact

Replaces "capacity" with "ability", a direct synonym, maintaining the core meaning.

capability to transact

Substitutes "capacity" with "capability", emphasizing the potential to perform transactions.

power to transact

Uses "power" to highlight the authority or right to engage in transactions.

right to transact

Focuses on the legal entitlement or permission to conduct transactions.

authority to transact

Emphasizes the official authorization or mandate to engage in transactions.

competence to transact

Highlights the sufficiency of qualifications and skills to transact

means to transact

Replaces "capacity" with "means", changing the focus to the resources available for transacting.

resources to transact

Stresses the availability of necessary resources to conduct transactions effectively.

potential to transact

Shifts the emphasis to the future possibility or likelihood of transacting.

wherewithal to transact

Uses a less common term, "wherewithal", to indicate the necessary means or resources.

FAQs

What does "capacity to transact" mean?

The phrase "capacity to transact" refers to the ability, power, or legal right to engage in business dealings, agreements, or other forms of exchange. It implies having the necessary authority and capability to conduct transactions effectively.

How can I use "capacity to transact" in a sentence?

You can use "capacity to transact" in sentences like: "The company must demonstrate its "ability to transact" in international markets" or "The individual lacked the legal "authority to transact" on behalf of the organization".

What are some alternatives to "capacity to transact"?

Some alternatives to "capacity to transact" include "ability to transact", "capability to transact", "power to transact", or "right to transact". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "capacity to transact" instead of "ability to transact"?

While "capacity" and "ability" are often interchangeable, "capacity to transact" tends to be more appropriate in formal or legal contexts, emphasizing the legal or official authorization to conduct transactions. "Ability to transact" is generally more flexible and can be used in broader, less formal situations.