Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The tested ESH LWSCC properties were, slump flow, V-funnel flow time, J-ring flow diameter/height difference, L-box ratio, filling capacity, segregation resistance, unit weight and compressive strength.
Similar(59)
The responses of the derived statistical models were slump flow, V-funnel flow time, J-ring flow diameter/height difference, L-box ratio, filling capacity, sieve segregation, unit weight and compressive strength.
Slump flow diameter, V-funnel flow time, J-ring flow diameter, J-ring height difference, L-box ratio, filling capacity, sieve segregation, fresh/28-day air/oven dry unit weights and 7- and 28-day compressive strengths were evaluated to analyze influence of mix design parameters and develop the models.
The rheological properties of SCC like slump flow, filling capacity and segregation along with compressive strength were modeled using ANN.
Just after mixing, the slump flow, L-box, V-funnel, J-ring flow, filling capacity, sieve segregation, and unit weight tests were conducted.
Such responses included slump flow diameter, V-funnel flow time, J-ring flow diameter, J-ring height difference, L-box ratio, filling capacity, sieve segregation, unit weight and compressive strength.
Statistically significant models for ESH LWSCCs with a high correlation coefficient R 2 > 0.90 were established for the slump flow, V-funnel, J-ring, J-ring height difference, L-box, filling capacity, sieve segregation resistance and 28-day compressive strength.
On the other hand a balanced LWSCC mixture with w/b of around 0.35 made with ESH lightweight aggregates exhibited satisfactory workability, passing ability, filling capacity and segregation resistance. 2.
The relative errors at the 95%% confidence limit for slump flow, V-funnel flow time, J-ring flow, L-box, filling capacity, sieve segregation resistance test, fresh unit weight, 28-day air dry unit weight, 28-day oven dry unit weight, and 7- and 28-day compressive strength in ESH LWSCC model are found to be limited to 0.6 9.7 %.
The total segregation capacity of prisons in England and Wales was 1,586 cells in 2015, including 54 places in "close supervision centres", which house some of the most dangerous men in the system.
That is why their capacity for speech segregation is much limited than the human capacity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com