Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Hence, using Lemmas 2.5 and 3.8, on growing of (c > 0) we can invoke the usual continuous dependence and monotonicity argument thanks to (25) and (26), which guarantee that both (y_{c, f}^ ) cannot reach 1 and (y_{c, f}^) cannot vanish without crossing each other.
Similar(59)
We affirm that F ( z, f ) cannot vanish identically.
In this situation, it cannot be expected that the disease will vanish without strong human intervention.
But those who then vanish without a trace -– the people who cannot be located and are often never found –- constitute a rapidly growing crisis looming on the horizon for baby boomers and their loved ones.
Violators Will Vanish Without a Trace".
Instead, Dereth will simply vanish without trace.
We will not vanish without a fight!
They appear and vanish without locomotion.
He would vanish without a trace.
Hey ho, some events vanish without trace".
"Children vanish without dying," Joy Williams wrote.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com