cannot be infringed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cannot be infringed" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts to assert that a right or privilege is protected and cannot be violated. Example: "The right to free speech is fundamental and cannot be infringed upon by the government."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

26 human-written examples

recognizes that certain rights belong to the state & cannot be infringed upon by the Nat.

The New York Times - Magazine

The unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.

The New York Times

It states that "the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed".

The New York Times

It specifies that "the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed".

The New York Times

This is why we say the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.

The New York Times

That is why we say the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

34 human-written examples

Shall not be infringed, means exactly what it says".

The Economist

They can't be infringed or limited in any way.

The New York Times

Thus, confidentiality could be infringed under the court order.

Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences

The right of privacy shall not be infringed upon.

Huffington Post

Hegel goes on to develop the imperative of right, i.e., people have rights that should not be infringed upon.

BMC Medical Ethics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When asserting a right, use "cannot be infringed" to clearly state that the right is protected from any violation. For instance, "The freedom of speech is a fundamental right and "cannot be infringed" by the government."

Common error

Avoid using "cannot be infringed" in casual conversation. This phrase is best reserved for formal, legal, or ethical discussions. Using it in informal contexts may sound overly formal or pretentious.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cannot be infringed" functions as a predicate in sentences, asserting a strong prohibition against violating a right, principle, or agreement. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage and emphasizes its role in legal and formal discourse.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cannot be infringed" is a robust declaration of inviolability, primarily employed in formal, legal, and ethical contexts. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically correct and commonly used to safeguard rights and principles. Its usage is prevalent in "News & Media" and scientific domains, emphasizing its formal nature. When writing, reserve "cannot be infringed" for situations requiring a strong assertion of protection, and avoid it in casual conversation to maintain an appropriate tone. Alternatives such as "must not be violated" or "is inviolable" offer subtle variations in emphasis. The examples provided by Ludwig underscore its significance in upholding fundamental rights and ethical standards.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

must not be violated

Replaces "cannot" with "must not", changing the modality from inability to prohibition.

is immune from infringement

Uses "immune" to convey resistance to infringement, adding a layer of resilience.

is inviolable

Replaces the verb phrase with a single adjective emphasizing the impossibility of violation.

should not be violated

Replaces "cannot" with "should not", weakening the strength of the statement to a recommendation.

is guaranteed protection

Highlights the assurance of protection, focusing on the guarantee.

is sacrosanct

Emphasizes the sacredness and thus the untouchable nature of something.

is shielded from violation

Uses "shielded" to suggest active protection against violation.

remains unassailable

Emphasizes the strength and resilience against any form of attack or infringement.

must be protected

Shifts the focus from preventing infringement to actively ensuring protection.

is beyond reproach

Highlights the ethical or moral high ground, suggesting that infringement is unthinkable.

FAQs

How to use "cannot be infringed" in a sentence?

Use "cannot be infringed" to assert that a right or principle is protected and immune from violation. For example: "The right to privacy is fundamental and "cannot be infringed"."

What's the difference between "cannot be infringed" and "should not be violated"?

"Cannot be infringed" asserts a stronger, often legal, protection against violation, suggesting an impossibility or prohibition. "Should not be violated" implies a moral or ethical obligation but acknowledges a possibility of violation. You could use alternatives like "must not be violated".

What are some alternatives to "cannot be infringed"?

Alternatives include "must be protected", "is inviolable", or "is sacrosanct" depending on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "cannot be infringed" in academic writing?

Yes, it is appropriate in academic writing, especially when discussing legal rights, ethical principles, or constitutional protections. Ensure the context aligns with the formal and precise nature of academic discourse.