Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
I do think that in the absence of a very compelling reason to vote for a candidate, those social issues can be deal-breakers for young voters.
Not every rating system is available for every candidate: those who have never served in Congress have no DW-Nominate score, for example.
Yet if it can close ranks around a strong candidate, those who have been prophesying its imminent collapse for a while may be disappointed.
If it "cannot be determined for which candidate those illegal votes were counted", Mr Coleman argues, then, well, something will happen.
But we don't know which candidate those ballots would have gone to, or whether the people who requested them ever filled them out.
First, a third-party movement in 2012 won't be a "spoiler". There is little risk of a Ralph Naderesulte resulthatat diverts a handful of votes and throws the election to a candidate those voters can't abide.
Similar(47)
And a bit of good news for aspiring M.B.A. candidates: those opportunities seem to be increasing.
While the agency looked for viable candidates, those with no terrorism ties sat in limbo.
No matter how loudly noncitizens may promote or oppose candidates, those candidates will ultimately be judged by voting citizens, to whom they must be responsive.
The membership committees then vote on the candidates; those who get a majority are invited to join.
There are no limits to the dollars involved, and no accountability for the candidates those dollars are buying.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com