Sentence examples for can only involve from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, taking design to be the best explanation for something requires prior identification of the appropriate properties as design-relevant, and that recognition must have a different basis.[14] And again, substantive comparison can only involve known alternatives, which at any point represent a vanishingly small fraction of the possible alternatives.

The only way to repeal Obamacare is to do so through the special budget "reconciliation" procedure, which is impossible to filibuster but, by rule, can only involve measures related to the budget.

As ROS1-rearranged patients are rare, these results can only involve small numbers of patients: they will now require further validation in larger cohorts of ROS1-rearranged and negative patients to establish clear numerical thresholds for their prognostic and/or predictive potential.

We propose that this strategy can only involve a turn (which we define as a change in heading angle by the prey), for the following reasons: i. straight line deceleration will reduce D faster, ii. in a straight line trajectory, the prey can only maximise D by maximizing its speed, iii.

qRT-PCR assays have been successfully implemented in clinical practice from fixed tissue for multi-gene assays, but such PCR-based assays can only feasibly involve 30 or fewer genes.

However, taking into account that only six lysine residues of PTP-SL and three of ERK2 are involved in cross-linking and that a given lysine residue can only be involved in a single cross-linking interaction, it can be inferred that only three alternatives are possible as concerning the networks of the cross-linked lysine residues (FIG. 4).

The disease can be monostotic and polyostotic or only involve one limb (monomelic) [ 42].

My experience is that most employers want to help but they can only get involved if you let them.

Non-Sikhs can only be involved if they accept the Sikh faith and change their name to include Singh or Kaur, the council insists.

As a result, it doesn't bother to invest in technology: more efficient European companies can only get involved in gas extraction in Siberia if they partner with Gazprom, and share their technological secrets.

Now, accepting that as controlling law, why does that not mean that the courts of this state can only be involved in resolving controversies and contests where the Legislature explicitly gives this court that power, or a court, that power, which it has not done in respect to presidential electors in 102.168?