can be identify

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "can be identify" is not correct in English.
The correct form should be "can be identified." You can use the corrected phrase when discussing the ability to recognize or determine something. Example: "The symptoms of the disease can be identified through a series of tests."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Academia

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Multitasking – I would rather define it as, "conditinal" where the limit can be identify and set using set of psychological questions.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In the event of an emergency medical situation the individual's randomization code and group allocation can be identify.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Can be identified with.

The Guardian - Opinion

Five sections can be identified.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Neither artist can be identified.

Princeton University

Flame failure can be identified.

Chemical Engineering Science

Three principal forms can be identified.

Britannica

Besides Dimmick, nobody can be identified.

Cornell University

Three ablation regions can be identified.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Nevertheless, consistent trends can be identified.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Few torturers, even when they can be identified, are punished.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the passive form "can be identified" instead of the ungrammatical "can be identify". Using the correct passive form ensures clarity and credibility in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "can be identify" as it incorrectly mixes active and passive voice. Always use "can be identified" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "can be identify" is intended to express the possibility of recognizing or determining something. However, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "can be identified", using the passive voice.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "can be identify" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. The correct form is "can be identified". As Ludwig AI highlights, using the correct passive form ensures clarity and credibility in your writing. While examples exist, they do not represent standard English usage. The intended meaning revolves around expressing the potential for something to be recognized or determined, but the incorrect grammar undermines this purpose. Always opt for the grammatically sound "can be identified", "can be recognized", or similar alternatives to ensure your message is clear and professional.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

can be recognized

Focuses on the act of noticing or becoming aware of something.

can be determined

Highlights the process of finding something out definitively.

can be detected

Emphasizes the act of discovering something, often something hidden.

can be ascertained

Implies a careful and systematic effort to find something out.

can be pinpointed

Suggests locating something with great precision.

can be distinguished

Highlights the ability to tell the difference between things.

can be diagnosed

Specifically used in medical or technical contexts.

can be uncovered

Implies revealing something previously unknown.

can be understood

Focuses on the comprehensibility of something.

can be classified

Highlights the categorization of something.

FAQs

How do I properly use the phrase "can be identified" in a sentence?

Use "can be identified" when you want to express that something is able to be recognized or determined. For example, "The source of the error "can be identified" through careful analysis".

What are some alternatives to "can be identified"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "can be recognized", "can be detected", or "can be determined".

Is "can be identify" ever correct?

No, "can be identify" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is always ""can be identified"", which uses the passive voice.

What's the difference between "can be identified" and "can identify"?

"Can identify" means someone or something has the ability to recognize or determine something. "Can be identified" means something is able to be recognized or determined by someone or something else. The first is active, the second is passive.