Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "caloric for" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe the purpose or intention behind consuming a certain amount of calories. Here is an example: "I'm trying to maintain a caloric deficit for weight loss." In this sentence, "caloric for" is used to indicate that the person is consuming less calories than their body needs in order to lose weight.
Exact(1)
Participants who did not have access to nutrition information were asked to estimate the health risk associated with food items that were slightly more caloric for Subway than McDonald's (640 kcal vs. 600 kcal).
Similar(59)
Despite high rates of obesity in adolescents, little is known about their individual motives for eating caloric foods for reasons unrelated to hunger.
When comparing meals, we found 42% of caloric compensation for breakfast, no caloric compensation for lunch and zero to 22% of caloric compensation for dinner, differing by household per capita income.
A fair amount is known about overall caloric requirements for weight restoration and maintenance for AN.
This diet is highly caloric (HCD) for the Psammomys, but not for the Gerbillus or the Wistar rats.
Starch is the main source of caloric intake for human consumption, and it is used for a wide array of nonfood applications.
MtDNA mutations in northern migrants decreased caloric utilization for ATP generation while increasing that used for generating heat, creating a metabolic advantage for survival in colder climates.
For both occasions, patients were instructed to maintain the same caloric intake for 3 days before examination.
For example, Bohensky et al. identified irreplaceable land units for food and water provision to meet pre-determined targets of caloric intake for a given population.
The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend that carbohydrates make up 45-65% of your daily caloric intake for a standard diet.
Through conscious control, most of us can reduce our caloric intake for a period of time.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com