calls for violent

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "calls for violent" is not correct in English.
It should be "calls for violence" to be grammatically accurate. You can use it when discussing a situation or statement that demands or incites violent action or behavior. Example: "The recent events in the city have led many to believe that the current political climate calls for violence as a means of protest."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

"It calls for violent revolution.

The New York Times

As long as injustice and illegitimacy remain, there will be potent rallying calls for violent attacks against the institutions of government.

The Guardian - Opinion

There is a new buzz among British Muslims - there are few calls for violent retaliation or slogans of hatred, even from groups of young men.

The Guardian

June 7, 1943 Knoxville, Tennessee Nikki Giovanni, byname of Yolande Cornelia Giovanni, Jr. (born June 7 , 1943 Knoxville, Tenn., U.S). African-American poet whose writings ranged from calls for violent revolution to poems for children and intimate personal statements.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"The calls for violent acts do not relate to the Bahraini people's peaceful movement for democracy," Al-Wefaq said in a statement released in English today.

Vice

Healthy political debate can sustain a great deal of anger and passion, but it cannot sustain repeated threats of violence and calls for violent assault as a form of political engagement.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Mr. Awlaki has called for violent jihad against the West.

The New York Times

Even when the concept of a dance called for violent emotions, as in Barak Marshall's "Harry" (2012), it was carried out with almost clinical precision.

The New York Times - Arts

Saleh had a political motive: Salafists are mostly quiescent and preach obedience to the ruler (even if they call for violent jihad in other lands).

The New York Times - Magazine

Prosecutors also played parts of a 1997 television interview with Osama bin Laden for the jury, in which he called for violent jihad against the United States.

The New York Times

Hussain is believed to have tweeted under the pseudonym Abu Hussain al Britani, posting tweets calling for violent attacks against Israeli diplomats and encouraging more recruits to travel to join Isis.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "calls for violent". The grammatically correct form is "calls for violence". Ensure you use the noun "violence" instead of the adjective "violent".

Common error

Don't use "violent" as a direct object of "calls for". "Violent" is an adjective; you need the noun "violence". Using "calls for violent" is a common error that detracts from clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "calls for violent" is grammatically incorrect. As per Ludwig AI, the correct form is "calls for violence". The primary function of the corrected phrase is to express a demand or incitement of violent actions.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Encyclopedias

15%

Science

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "calls for violent" is grammatically incorrect. The accurate form is "calls for violence", where "violence" is a noun. This phrase typically appears in news and media contexts when describing situations where violence is being advocated. Remember to use the correct grammatical form to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, using "violence" instead of "violent" ensures grammatical accuracy. Related phrases include "incites violence" and "advocates violence", offering alternative ways to express similar ideas while maintaining grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

calls for violence

Corrected grammatical form of the original query, focusing on demanding violent actions.

incites violence

Focuses on the action of provoking or urging violent behavior.

demands violence

Highlights the insistence or requirement of violence as a solution or action.

advocates violence

Emphasizes the public support and recommendation of violence.

promotes violence

Stresses the active encouragement and spread of violent actions.

urges violent action

Highlights the act of strongly encouraging or pushing for violent measures.

appeals for violence

Focuses on making a serious or urgent request for violent actions.

foments violence

Emphasizes the act of instigating or stirring up violence.

instigates violence

Highlights the role of initiating or causing violence.

prescribes violence

Focuses on violence as a recommended or required course of action.

FAQs

How to correctly use the phrase "calls for violence" in a sentence?

The correct phrase is "calls for violence". For example, "The leader's speech "calls for violence" against the oppressors."

What is the difference between "calls for violence" and "incites violence"?

"Calls for violence" directly demands violent action, while "incites violence" suggests actions that provoke or encourage violence without explicitly demanding it. They are semantically similar but have a slightly different connotation.

Is it grammatically correct to say "calls for violent"?

No, "calls for violent" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""calls for violence"", using the noun form.

What are some alternative phrases to "calls for violence" that convey a similar meaning?

Alternatives include "advocates violence", "promotes violence", or "urges violent action", depending on the specific context you wish to convey.