Sentence examples for calling approaches from inspiring English sources

It is important to keep in mind that because the vendors used independent mapping and SNP calling approaches, differential results due to the platform cannot be distinguished from those due to the analysis pipeline.

We therefore set to investigate the relative performance of both SNP calling approaches for the 696 genome-wide SNPs, reminding that all SNPs tested in the genotyping assay were predicted by PolyBayes with ≥99% probability.

More SNPs were called by Illumina/Maq than by Applied Biosystems, but because the vendors used independent mapping and SNP calling approaches, differential results are likely due to differences in the analysis pipelines, as no nucleotide bias in the frequency of the calls made by the Genome Analyzer and SOLiD was apparent.

Overall, the three analytical methods described above have several differences in their allele calling approaches but share at least two general assumptions: artificial sequences should be less frequent than true alleles; and artefacts should have their sources in the true alleles (e.g. chimeras and single base pair mismatches).

More conservative calling approaches will be preferable for other study designs.

At sequence read coverage >15x, the differences in error rates between the different variant calling approaches become negligible.

Partly to address such challenges, we have proposed an empirical coverage-based genotype calling approach.

We will briefly review the Affymetrix calling approach on Affymetrix 10K Mapping Array.

Another significant aspect of our work is the detailed analysis of ASE calling approach.

This, she calls, "approaching the device from a content perspective".

Tongue approach grafting is also called approach grafting, side grafting, or side-by-side grafting.