Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
So, I'm going to put the scientific debate aside for now and challenge the idea that calling addiction a disease is beneficial for addicts.
"The danger in calling addiction a brain disease is people think that makes you a hapless victim," he says.
Dr. Marc Lewis sure makes some decent arguments against calling addiction a disease.
Calling addiction a disease has had its benefits (like the discovery of new drugs that help a subset of addicts, often temporarily).
Similar(53)
So then, do you want to call addiction a disease?
Couldn't the Iraqi dictator's condition just as easily be called "addiction to power"?
Peter Provet, Odyssey House's president, calls addiction among those who are middle-aged and beyond "an unspoken, unaddressed problem".
"A lot of the behavior we call addiction is really a love of pleasure that carries the force of habit," he notes.
Dr. Babor, a top editor for Dr. Edwards's journal, now called Addiction, added, "He was the father of some of the major conceptual advances in this field".
Rather, it underscores the complexity and depth of the demon called addiction, a condition for which approximately 10percentt of us are vulnerable.
If we don't call addiction a disease, don't we risk going back to the bad old days of denigrating addicts as self-indulgent, spineless pariahs?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com