call was lower

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "call was lower" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey that a call's value or amount was reduced, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "The call was lower than expected, leading to concerns about the company's performance."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In the current study, we have appointed and discarded an MSV combination as artificial if its relative number of call was lower than 10% (1/10; cloning/Sanger and GS FLX run 1) or 6% (1/16; ultra-deep FLX runs 2 and 3).

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The video call is lower quality, but it works with virtually all European 3G mobile phones and many U.S. ones as well, without the need to install any additional software.

TechCrunch

Both BSmooth and MAGI showed similar consistency, although the number of regions called was lower in both cases.

Bioinformatics

For males, the proportion of stack calls was lower than for females and showed less prominent differences between breeding stages: there was a decrease over the course of the breeding stages.

eLife

The rate of concordant SNP calls was lower when testing with less template DNA (97.8% for 17 ng/μl, 94.3% for 10 ng/μl, and 81.2% for 4 ng/μl, all assays in 5 μl sample volume).

BMC Genomics

The threshold for variation at a specific base in the genome needed for SNP calling was lowered to ≥10% of reads, yielding an aberrant base call for the CEN.PK113-7D CEN.PK113-7Dnt fread≥35% for R57 SNP calignment order to maintain stringency on positive variation calling.

Biotechnology for Biofuels

In analysing all the ten seaports, Aveiro is the smaller and without deepwater, the number of ship calls is lower, so it's more difficult to taking advantage of scale economies.

European Transport Research Review

In fact, inbreeding coefficients derived from ROH > 16 Mb with no allowance for heterozygous calls were lower than inbreeding coefficients estimated from pedigrees.

Genetics, Selection, Evolution

Indel call completeness was lower on average than SNP call completeness for low divergence read pools, peaking at ca. 59% completeness for 16× coverage depth, but was nearly indistinguishable from SNP call completeness for high divergence read pools.

BMC Genomics

Monthly call volume was lower than anticipated; there were 14 calls from the 12 villages over 4 months.

BMJ Open

For the BM panel, the CpG call rate was lower for the 10 and 50 ng WGA samples (16.7 33.5%) compared with all other samples tested (46.5 53.0%).

Epigenetics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a decrease in calls, specify what type of call you are referring to and provide context. Instead of saying "call was lower", specify "the call volume was lower" or "the call rate was lower".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "call was lower" without a noun to specify what aspect of the call is being discussed. Instead of saying "call was lower", specify which aspect of the call is meant, for example, "the call volume was lower" or "the call quality was lower".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "call was lower" functions as a statement indicating a reduction or decrease. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is not grammatically correct in standard written English and lacks clarity without specifying what aspect of the call is lower.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

46%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "call was lower" is a phrase used to indicate a decrease in some aspect of telephone calls, but it's not grammatically correct in standard English without specifying what was lower (e.g., call volume, call quality, or call rate). As Ludwig AI pointed out, the phrase requires additional context to be clear and accurate. More precise and grammatically sound alternatives such as "call volume decreased" or "the call rate dropped" are often preferable. The contexts in which this phrase appears are primarily scientific and news media, where clear and accurate communication is essential. Therefore, ensure that when discussing calls, specify exactly what aspect is being quantified to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

call volume decreased

This alternative replaces "was lower" with the verb "decreased", directly indicating a reduction in the number of calls.

calling rate declined

This phrase uses "declined" instead of "was lower", suggesting a drop in the frequency of calls.

number of calls reduced

This alternative uses "reduced" to indicate a decrease in the quantity of calls.

call frequency diminished

Replacing "was lower" with "diminished" indicates a reduction in how often calls occur.

there were fewer calls

This option offers a more direct and simple way to express that the quantity of calls was less than before.

call activity lessened

This alternative substitutes "was lower" with "lessened", indicating a reduction in overall calling activity.

the call rate dropped

This version uses "dropped" to suggest a sudden or significant fall in the call rate.

call intensity waned

This phrase uses "waned" to imply that the strength or frequency of calls gradually decreased.

the quantity of calls decreased

This alternative explicitly mentions "quantity", making it clear that the number of calls has gone down.

a reduction in call numbers

This phrase uses "reduction" to highlight that there has been a decrease.

FAQs

How can I use "call volume decreased" in a sentence?

You can use "call volume decreased" to indicate a reduction in the number of calls. For example, "After the marketing campaign, the "call volume decreased" significantly".

What's a more grammatically correct way to say "call was lower"?

Instead of saying "call was lower", it is better to specify what aspect of the call you are referring to. Use phrases like ""call volume decreased"" or "the call quality was lower".

Which is correct, "call was lower" or "call volume was lower"?

"Call volume was lower" is more grammatically correct because it specifies what aspect of the "call" is being measured. "Call was lower" is vague and less clear.

What can I say instead of "the calling rate was lower"?

You can use alternatives such as "calling rate declined", "number of calls reduced", or "the call rate dropped" depending on the context.