call for conversation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "call for conversation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating a need or desire for dialogue or discussion on a particular topic. Example: "The recent events in the community call for conversation about how we can improve our outreach efforts."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The call for "conversation" as the solution then reinforces this idea that the legitimate problems with law enforcement vocalized by minority communities are really all just one big misunderstanding.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

A survey by the board in May had shown a 1.5% increase in consumption despite calls for conversation by officials.

Los Angeles Times

The NAHT has called for "conversations" about online dangers to start early in primary school but Mr Hobby says these should be "general warnings that they may see things they don't like online and advice on what to do about it when they do".

BBC

A clarion call for rational conversation has to have causes and champions and, yes, even politicians to accompany it.

Huffington Post

It's called Comics for Conversation.

Huffington Post

Beyond that, "it's a call for having conversations with your family members about what you want," Dr. Torke said — that's conversations, plural.

The New York Times

We are committed to do whatever we can individually and collectively to support the call for national conversations about mass killings and gun violence -- promising to actively engage communities in meaningful dialogue and debate.

Huffington Post

Truth telling, the call for public conversations on race, racism, and recognition of intersectional realities - state and domestic forms of violence, police shootings and the shootings of police, health and gender equity, queer and transgender equality, Islamophobia and immigration, to name a few - is terribly important.

Huffington Post

Multi-faith chaplains are often called upon for conversations related to end-of-life decisions or rituals related to death or grief.

Huffington Post

Abbott also called for "a conversation rather than a scare campaign" when debating the big issues.

The Guardian

And yet there are signs of hope, beginning with Raúl Castro's repeated calls for a conversation with Washington.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "call for conversation", ensure the context clearly indicates the topic or issue needing discussion. Providing specific areas for conversation enhances clarity and purpose.

Common error

Avoid using "call for conversation" without a clear subject or purpose. Overusing the phrase in vague contexts can dilute its impact and make the writing seem unfocused. Specify what needs to be discussed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "call for conversation" functions as a noun phrase that expresses a need or demand for dialogue or discussion on a specific issue. Ludwig examples showcase its use in various contexts, reinforcing its role as a prompt for discussion. Ludwig AI validates the correctness and usability of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "call for conversation" is a versatile expression used to advocate for dialogue on a particular topic. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely used, particularly in news and media contexts. While seemingly straightforward, effective use requires a clear subject and purpose. Alternatives like "urge dialogue" or "request dialogue" can add nuance. However, be mindful of overuse in vague contexts, which can diminish its impact. By understanding its purpose and appropriate usage, "call for conversation" can be a powerful tool for sparking meaningful discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

urge dialogue

Replaces "call" with "urge" emphasizing a strong recommendation. Shifts from noun to verb.

request dialogue

Substitutes "call" with "request", indicating a formal appeal for dialogue.

appeal for discussion

Uses "appeal" instead of "call", suggesting a plea for debate or deliberation.

encourage discussion

Uses "encourage" instead of "call", softening the imperative for conversation.

promote dialogue

Focuses on encouraging conversation, changing from a demand to an action.

foster communication

Highlights improving interaction, less direct than a 'call'.

initiate a discussion

Highlights starting a conversation, focusing on the act of beginning.

seek a conversation

Indicates a search or desire for conversation, differing from a direct call.

advocate discussion

Emphasizes public support for conversation.

stimulate debate

Focuses on encouraging active discussion, often in a formal setting.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "call for conversation" in a sentence?

To effectively use "call for conversation", clearly state the subject needing discussion and the desired outcome. For instance, "The recent budget cuts /s/call+for+conversation about fiscal priorities" is more impactful than a general statement.

What are some alternatives to "call for conversation"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "urge dialogue", "request dialogue", or "appeal for discussion" to convey a similar meaning.

Is "call for a conversation" formal or informal?

"Call for a conversation" is generally considered neutral to slightly formal. It is suitable for news articles, reports, and professional communications. For very informal settings, consider simpler alternatives like "let's talk about it".

What is the difference between "call for conversation" and "call for debate"?

"Call for conversation" suggests a general discussion aimed at understanding or resolving an issue. "Call for debate" implies a more structured and potentially adversarial discussion with opposing viewpoints. Consider the intended format of the discussion when choosing between the two.