By carrying out numerical calculation, solutions of the Eq. 16 yields to the energy levels E j ± with the corresponding wavefunctions of the symmetric and antisymmetric hole states, F j ± ( z ) = { A ± ( l, d ) sin ( k z ), left well A ± ( l, d ) sin ( k l ) exp ( K ( z − l ) ) ± exp ( − K ( z − l ) − d ) 1 ± exp ( K d ), barrier ± A ± ( l, d ) sin ( k ( 2 l + d − z ) ), right well (17).
This method is based on Dynamic Shear Rheometer tests performed on mortars composed of RAP fine fraction and virgin binder, together with a new back-calculation solution.
Basically, the square-root impedance amplification is a first-order approximation of the total amplification derived by wave-calculation solutions.
This avoids the recursive calculation of solution of mother (non-leaf) cells.
The calculation of solution uncertainty, given input uncertainty, falls under the rubric of uncertainty quantification (UQ).
For the numerical calculation, the solution domain of the problem is restricted over an interval a ≤ x ≤ b.
Performance on this arithmetic task was measured in terms of accuracy – percentage correct and absolute calculation error – solution latencies, and efficiency.
The primary focus of this paper is the design of efficient algorithm for the calculation of solution to the placement of proxies for performance optimization in hierarchical reliable multicast (HRM).
As the both the refined and the refinedQ calculations have higher final values of the docking potential than either of the plain calculations, the solution is less accurate.
The thermodynamic coefficient was determined via (i) dilute limit calculations, (ii) solution of the Ornstein Zernike equation with the hypernetted-chain (HNC) closure or (iii) cell model calculations.
