Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(21)
This calculation is very simple and requires only an alignment length and RMSD as calculated by the method, which all of the methods tested here report.
However, the margin of error on the calculation is very high at this early stage.
However, its calculation is very complex due to the possibility of presence of multiple phases.
Agreement between the measurement and calculation is very good, except for the x-component at Jokkmokk.
But the amount of calculation is very large, the efficiency of star identification is low.
However, this calculation is very complex and time consuming due to the large number of carbon nanotubes in the array.
Similar(39)
The computation time for our implementation was the same as that of Grisetti et al. [1] because the additional weight calculation was very short.
Even if the assumptions made for this calculation are very strong considering flow in natural non-smooth fractures, one can assume that the levels of injection flow rate are far from this critical value and thus the fluid flow in the fracture will be globally laminar.
Nevertheless the agreement between the GPS data and model calculations is very good.
It is shown that the agreement between experiments and calculations is very good.
The agreement between experimental results and results from simulations based on finite element calculations is very high, especially considering harmonics.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com