Surface heat-flow values of 46.4 and 47.9 mW m−2 were calculated from the T-logs and calculated thermal conductivity values in two wells.
The validity of the model is tested by applying it to a set of model structures and comparing calculated effective conductivity values against analytical results.
Difference between the calculated thermal conductivity values of with and without coagulation simulations is 6.13% for 0.02 volume fraction, 7.14% for 0.03 volume fraction and 10.47% for 0.05 volume fraction on Cu(100 nm)/DIW nanofluids.
To investigate those dependencies, we have calculated conductivities by using double and half those values used and have compared them with those derived using the normal values.
The determined values were compared with the conductivity values calculated by a pH & Conductivity Calculator software.
It can be seen from the maps that spatial distribution of aquifer hydraulic conductivity values calculated from total resistivity match well with that obtained through pumping test.
Conductivity values were calculated from the slopes of the I V curves and the thickness of each film.
Electrical conductivity values were calculated as a function of particle size, concentration, location and temperature.
Conductivity values were calculated from the Equation 2: σ dc = 1 R dc l S (2).
