EJTT is calculated by avg.
Node strengths (ns) of the network in Figure 10, calculated as avg (Diretto et al, 2010).
Figure 3A shows a dimensionless description of effective optical sampling depth, given here as 〈 Z MC〉/ d f, plotted vs. μ′ s, avgd f, with μ′ s, avg calculated as the average of μ′ s(λ x) and μ′ s(λ m) for each measurement.
These Ct values were averaged and the difference between the 18S Ct (Avg) and the gene of interest Ct (Avg) was calculated (Ct-diff).
These Ct values were averaged and the difference between the GAPDH Ct (Avg) and the gene of interest Ct (Avg) was calculated (Ct-diff).
The average pore diameters (d avg) were calculated from Eq. (1) (Singh et al. 2012).
But considering that T avg is calculated as the average of T min and T max and given that the effect of T max was not significant we think the significant effects of T avg found here are the result of strong correlation between T min and T avg (R2 = 0.84) and not an effect of T avg per-se.
Specifically, the ΔCT -Sample value was calculated as ΔCT Sample = avg.
The remaining frequency profiles were tested in the second step and accepted if the following logical expression is true: (3) 0.4 < L 2 / L i For the selected frequency profiles the average (Avg) were calculated using the corresponding raw count values of the L 2 to L i list elements and the ln(Avg/Min) values were tabulated with the head and tail motif (spanion).
The average variant fraction (F-AVG) for all three chromosomes (7, 9 and 11) was calculated as follow: F-AVG = (F7 + F9 + F11)/3, where F7, F9 and F11 are the variant fractions of chromosome7, 9 and 11, respectively.
As such, the number of data sessions using b avg + 1 resources is calculated as κ = mod(b k 2), b avg κ a) and the number of data sessions using b avg resources is given by κ a − κ.
