Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
A chi-square difference test was calculated; a significant difference between two nested models implies that the model with more paths explains the data better [ 44].
Similar(59)
Only one trial (474 women: Mustacchi et al, 2003) reported adequate data on PFS to calculate a significant difference favouring surgery plus endocrine therapy (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53 0.81, P=0.0001).
The 95% CI of SIR was calculated and a significant difference between the two samples was noted when the confidence interval did not include 1.0.
Exponential phase doubling times were calculated and a significant difference (p = 0.0304) was observed between ST17 (average: 55.186 min, SD: 8.216 min) and ST203 isolates (average: 48.136 min, SD: 7.611 min).
The power analysis of the RCT study was calculated considering a significant difference of 25%% between the test and the control group and a 95%% probability of obtaining a significant difference between groups at the 5 % level; the number of subjects per group was set at 66.
Assuming an effect size of 0.7 from previous reports, a total sample size of 40 animals was calculated to determine a significant difference between SEP amplitudes with an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of 0.95 between the four groups.
The comparison between measured PFM and calculated PFM demonstrated a significant difference with increments of age.
Sample size was calculated to detect a significant difference in median BHI between the comparison groups, with a power of 90% to detect a difference of 15%, which gives 83 cases in every group.
However, when the age-adjusted BMI was calculated and compared, a significant difference was identified (χ 2 = 18.759; p < 0.001), the control group having two times more obese adolescents compared to the athletes group.
Considering a biological variation for bone markers of 35%, a group size of 35 subjects per group/arm was calculated to observe a significant difference (p < 0.05) in bone markers of 25% between ch-OSA and placebo groups with a power of 85%.
Risk ratios were calculated to test for a significant difference in proportions between 2011 and 2020 regional ratios.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com