Sentence examples for by weight of substrate from inspiring English sources
The MAHT of SSB at 10 to 15%% by weight of substrate concentration and 121 °C0.5) °C for 30 to 120 min of isothermal treatment retention time resulted in about 70.42 (±3.41) % solids recovered after the treatment.
The SAHT of SSB, at 10 to 20 % by weight of substrate concentration and 121 °C0.5) °C for 30 to 120 min of treatment retention time, resulted in about 75.32 (±1.51) % solids recovered after the treatment.
The SALT of the SAHT-SSB at 121 °C0.5) °C for 30 to 120 min with 10%% substrate concentration and 10 20 % by weight of the substrate Ca(OH 2 dosage resulted in 77.84 (±8.09) % solids recovery.
The residue obtained from the SAHT was dried and then subjected to the steam-assisted lime treatment (SALT) at 121 °C0.5) °C for 30 to 120 min with 10%% of the mixture substrate concentration and calcium hydroxide dosage varying from 10to20%0 % by weight of the substrate.
Similarly, the residue obtained from the MAHT was dried and then subjected to the MW-assisted lime treatment (MALT) at 121 °C0.5) °C for 30 to 120 min with 10%% by weight of the mixture substrate concentration and calcium hydroxide dosage varying from 10to20%0 % by weight of the substrate.
The enzyme reaction conditions for the solubilization were optimized via a surface response design to be addition of 0.27% Viscozyme® L by weight of potato pulp substrate dry matter, 1 h treatment at pH 3.5, 62.5 °C.
The use of Agu115 as a single enzyme on the untreated GAX led to the release of MeGlcA representing 1.2%% by weight of the total dry substrate (8.5 % total MeGlcA content), (Table 1).
About 9 × 1010 cells/g fresh weight of substrate could be removed by manual shaking, 21%; more than by shaking horizontally, and 10%; more than by sonication.
Normalizing the data by weight of cellulose in the two substrates, it can be calculated that from 100 grams of cellulose, 2.1 and 2.5 grams of gluconic acid was produced from filter paper and pretreated wheat straw at 50°C respectively, and at 33°C the yields were 3.4 and 3.9 grams of gluconic acid by the same materials, respectively.
The effect of four factors [i.e. X1 (dihydrocaffeic acid to hexanol molar ratio of 1 0.5 1 2); X2 (immobilized-enzyme amount 15 35% by the total weight of substrates); X3 (reaction time of 24 72 h) and X4 (reaction temperature of 40 60 °C)] were selected for the synthesis of hexyl dihydrocaffeate as a response variable and was assessed using RSM (Table 4).
The SSB powder was initially subjected to the hydrothermal treatments at 121 °C0.5) °C for 30 to 120 min with substrate concentration varying from 10to20%0 % by weight of the mixture.
