Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
By using the assumptions of the theorem, we conclude the proof.
Proof By using the assumptions of this lemma, we have G 1 ( t, s ) ≥ 0 for all ( t, s ) ∈ [ 0, 1 ] × [ 0, 1 ], and so u ( t ) ≥ 0 for all t ∈ [ 0, 1 ].
On the other hand, by using the assumptions of the theorem we easily get vert x_{n}vert lefrac{Vert fVert _{infty}}{sqrt{vert qvert } (sqrt{vert qvert }-1)}< infty, quad nin mathbb{N}_{0}, from which the boundedness of ((x_{n})_{ninmathbb{N}_{0}}), follows.
Similar(57)
Both Bürgi and Kepler were astronomical observers, and Kepler included logarithmic tables in his famous Tabulae Rudolphinae (1627; "Rudolphine Tables"), astronomical tabulations of planetary motion derived by using the assumption of elliptical orbits about the Sun.
By using the assumption that Δ ⊆ E ( G ), we immediately obtain X f ≠ ∅.
By using the assumption of, we can get following equality: (3.5).
By using the assumption, we have α ( x n, x ∗ ) ≥ 1 for all n.
The present work proposes achieving this goal by using the assumption of simple scaling invariance.
By using the assumption of (xg(x le0) for (xin -infty,0)cup(0,+infty)), we have (u_{0}(t^)le0), which contradicts (3.33).
These higher response moments should enable better reliability predictions than those obtained by using the assumption of Gaussian responses.
Both foreshocks and aftershocks, which are meaningless in seismotectonic investigations, were identified and removed by using the assumption reported by Gardner and Knopoff (1974).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com