Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Such comparisons revealed serious discrepancies between experiments and simulations for ultralean H2/air flames by using four kinetic mechanisms.
Similar(59)
The CO2 adsorption kinetic study was performed by using two kinetic models, and the second order was found fitted best with the experimental data with maximum error% of 2.28%.
The kinetic experimental data were analyzed using four kinetic equations including pseudo-first-order equation, pseudo-second-order equation, external diffusion model and intra-particular diffusion model.
A comparison of many experiments performed in several laboratories with different types of dilution by various inerts was guided by kinetic modeling using two kinetic mechanisms.
Kinetic analysis were performed using three kinetic models: Kissinger, Flynn Wall Ozawa and the phenomenological model developed by Kamal.
The drug release data from all microparticles formulation were evaluated by using four drug kinetic models and by comparison of their similarity factor (f2).
It was possible to estimate kinetic parameters by using three different kinetic methods and this allowed us to compare the E a values obtained from different experimental data, TG and DSC.
However, it should be emphasized that the measurement uncertainty of the 3P-KMA outcomes may be expected to be lower than that of the 5P-KMA one because Ki and kb from 5P-KMA has to be computed by using three independent kinetic (micro parameters (Eqs. 4 and 5).
Adsorption rate has been analyzed by using two common semi-empirical kinetic models which are based on adsorption equilibrium capacity: the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations.
The experimental data were compared with the numerical predictions obtained by using two independently developed recent C2 kinetic mechanisms.
Synchronously, preliminary kinetic investigations of this reaction were achieved by using two catalyst systems illustrating the activation energies of copolymerization and coupling reaction, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com