Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Inter-day precision of the method calculated after analysis of five different concentrations of mercury standard solutions by the same analyst in different days and by two different analysts in different days gave coefficient of variation 4.89 and 5.44%, respectively.
The analysis was repeated at separate occasions by two different analysts.
The DNA extractions were performed by two different analysts, at separate occasions, from each skull using two different protocols.
Sequence assembly and confirmation was performed independently by two different analysts, and followed by electronic data transfer to a secured laboratory information management system (LIMS) for sequence verification.
According to our in-house data quality management process, the resulting consensus sequences were inspected independently by two different analysts and reviewed by a third person.
The intermediate precision of the ruminant DNA analytical method was assessed by spiking a crude heparin sample and heparinase digestion buffer with ruminant DNA at 0.1, 1.0, 200, and 1,000 pg/μL and assaying each sample in triplicate on three separate days by two different analysts.
Similar(54)
Given the large scale of the Čḯxwicən project – over 112,000 fish remains were documented by five different analysts over three years – there was a real possibility that inconsistencies in laboratory practices affected analytic results (e.g., number of identified specimens, taxa present and relative abundance, elements identified, burning frequencies).
For intra-day variation, sets of the six replicates of the three concentrations were analysed on the same day; for intermediate precision, the six replicates were analysed on three different days by three different analysts.
To ensure inter-researcher reliability, analysis began with an independent reading, coding, and categorizing of the qualitative transcripts by three different analysts [ 64].
Two different analysts performed all steps in the analysis and numerous negative controls were included.
The ruggedness of the potentiometric method was evaluated [27] by carrying out the analysis using two different analyst (operator) and different instruments on different days.
More suggestions(16)
by two different investigators
by two different personalities
by two different researchers
by two different practitioners
by two different analysis
by two different analytical
by two different personnel
by two different procedures
by two different physiotherapists
by two different applications
by two different lobbies
by two different viruses
by two different routes
by two different persons
by two military analysts
by two different means
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com