Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The staining intensity was scored using a four step scale (0, 1+, 2+, or 3+) and the percentage of positive cells was estimated by three different pathologists (0 = none, 1 = <1%, 2 = 1 10%, 3 = 10 30%, 4 = 30 70%, 5 = >70% of tumor cells).
Each slide was independently examined by three different pathologists.
All staining was independently evaluated by three different pathologists who were blinded to patient outcomes.
If dysplasia was found, the microsections were evaluated by three different pathologists.
The degree of inflammation in five specimens was evaluated by three different pathologists.
The degree of inflammation was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 5 by three different pathologists that had been blinded to the treatments.
Similar(54)
Histological scoring was performed by two different pathologists in a blinded manner.
Immunostaining was evaluated by two different pathologists (EC and FL-R), using criteria based on published cut-offs, as follows.
The liver sections were coded and independently examined in a blinded manner by two different pathologists.
Each patient's microvessel count was the average of two separate counts by two different pathologists (SN and JW) who remained blind to patient outcome.
To determine the variation in histopathological tumour cell percentage scoring, H/E stained tumour sections were repeatably analysed in a period of six months by five different pathologists.
More suggestions(19)
by three different surgeons
by three other pathologists
by three different songs
by three forensic pathologists
by three certified pathologists
by three different structures
by three different cars
by three different formulas
by three different actors
by three senior pathologists
by three different journalists
by three different authors
by three different icebreakers
by three different satellites
by three different juries
by three different entries
by three different filmmakers
by three different fathers
by three different methods
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com