There was 100% concordance of the test results obtained by the two techniques.
Overall, fibers made by the two techniques were similar, but with some exceptions.
The films deposited by the two techniques differed in composition, structure and hardness.
The results showed significant differences in the volume of open and closed porosity measured by the two techniques.
Despite this discrepancy there was reasonably good agreement in the relative fluxes of 13C-substrates through the citric acid cycle determined by the two techniques.
Comparative experimental results have shown there is a large discrepancy between the magnitudes of the cathodic current obtained by the two techniques.
Herceptin conjugation was visualized by the FETEM with immumogold labeling and further quantified by the two techniques, i.e. the Bradford assay and the flow cytometry to confirm each other.
Excellent correspondence between the two statistical maps was observed, with fMRI maxima lying close to all meta-analysis peaks and statistical values at the peaks identified by the two techniques correlating strongly.
In this study, turbidity and confocal reflectance microscopy (CRM) were simultaneously employed to track collagen fibrillogenesis and reconcile the information reported by the two techniques, with confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) used to supplement information about early events in fibrillogenesis.
Both passive control using porous surface and active control with high momentum microjet injection are effective in reducing nearfield noise and flow unsteadiness over a range of geometrical parameters; however, the type of noise reduction achieved by the two techniques is different.
It is concluded that due to the differences in the quantities actually measured by the two techniques, and the significant differences in the measurement length scales (microns to 1 2 cm for NMR/MRM, tens of centimeters for transient response methods), there is no reliable way of directly comparing these results.
