Sentence examples for by the two protocols from inspiring English sources

This possibility is supported by differences observed between cells expanded by the two protocols in doubling time (about 7 days in our protocol, compared with 2.5 days in the Gershengorn protocol) and overall expansion rate (<105-fold in our protocol, compared with 1012-fold in the Gershengorn protocol).

To compare the tag frequencies obtained by the two protocols, cDNAs from two different samples (rice seedlings; sample f, and M. grisea-infected rice leaf sheath; sample l) were divided into half and either applied to Illumina sequencing (HT-SuperSAGE), or 454 pyrosequencing (original SuperSAGE) [17].

First, the types of mutations induced by the two protocols are different.

For nRBCs, the DM sites identified by the two protocols showed the least overlap (36 %), with the stringent protocol identifying far more nRBC DM sites than the standard protocol (8982 versus 2338) (Fig.  3e).

However, when the overlapped transcripts are isolated into sets based on the overlap percentage, the expression profiles determined by the two protocols become less and less correlated with the increase of the overlap percentage, real).

Although the number of genes identified to be differentially expressed in each category by the two protocols may be different, the usage of any of these protocols will identify the same functional pathways to be affected when comparing the two cell lines.

Samples from years 2008, 2003 and 1998 were analysed by each of the two protocols.

After obtaining the normalized total gene signal by using either of the two protocols, genes can be removed from the analysis by using the quality flags that AFE attaches to each feature (table 2).

Major results: There was a difference in task demand as measured by reaction time between the two protocols (the multiple probe protocol was more demanding), and a difference trend in P300 detection sensitivity between protocols for both information types combined in favor of the 1PB (p < .07).07

The impact of using shorter PCR products was evaluated by comparing array data across the two protocols.

Mechanistic investigations indicated that the two protocols proceed by different mechanistic pathways.