DW and RS provided the subjects' data by chart review.
A good fit to experiment 1 was obtained with the Bayesian inference model (see Fig. 3B, E, black line) by minimizing the log-likelihood of the subject data.
Further, because a regression toward the mean effect tended to be supported by the study data (i.e. subjects having high or low cut points from the right accelerometer had less extreme cut points from the left accelerometer), the established ICPs probably shouldn't be viewed as "true" ICPs.
The null distribution was obtained by permuting subjects' data between the groups, which makes use of the null hypothesis of no effect of group membership on BOLD signal, and refitting the linear model.
For the semiautomatic method, the thresholds were determined only by three subjects' data, which may not reflect the comprehensive features of the lesion.
In general, the true target population is specified not only by the subjects in the data but also by any covariates used to stratify the resampling, e.g., studies (when data from multiple studies are pooled together) or body weight categories.
The sensations reported by the subjects provide the data used in this report.
Only one third of graphics displayed by-subject data through the use of one-way plots, scatter plots, or other formats.
The caregivers were instructed to ensure the Daysimeter device was worn continuously (24 hours/day, except when showering) by the subjects for the entire data collection period.
Graphs infrequently portrayed by-subject data (9%) or advanced features (15%) such as pairing, symbolic dimensionality, or small multiples.
