Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(39)
All immunohistochemistry results were obtained in a CLIA Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment -certifiedd laboratory and quantified at the core site by the study pathologist, without reference to the PET or CT scan data.
Bladder tumors from both series were reviewed by the study pathologist (A.R.S).
Histologic slides were obtained and all cases underwent standardized histopathologic review by the study pathologist (RCB) to confirm diagnosis.
Tumor sections with the greatest proportion of malignant tissue were selected by the study pathologist for use in our molecular analyses.
Cryo-sections of frozen tissue samples, flanking the sections used for RNA and DNA isolation, were verified by the study pathologist (WM) to contain at least 50% of tumor cells.
Disease progression was inferred from liver biopsies (in average 2 biopsies per patient) that were evaluated by the study pathologist (HD) at the University of Washington, who was blinded to demographic and clinical data, according to the Ishak and Knodell scoring system [20], [21].
Similar(21)
In analyses of tumour behaviour and histologic subtype, classification was improved by having the study pathologist abstract data from all of the pathology reports; however, without a formal review of the specimen slides it is possible that there may be some misclassification.
Additional three surgeries were performed outside the study, but their pathology slides were reviewed by the study pathologists.
Thirty-three cases were identified, and the slides from each case were reviewed by the study pathologists (H.Z.K. and A.B.S).
Histologic sections of BRCA1-associated ER- and BRCA1-associated ER+ breast cancers were reviewed by the study pathologists blinded to the ER status of the tumor.
Histologic sections of the sporadic ER+ cancers were reviewed by the study pathologists and also assessed for each pathologic feature described above.
More suggestions(19)
by the study physician
by the study doctor
by the study protocol
by the study endpoint
by the study psychiatrist
by the reference pathologist
by the study website
by the study biostatistician
by the study manager
by the study principal
by the study team
by the referent pathologist
by the study another
by the study group
by the study surgeon
by the study method
by the study sponsor
by the study coordinator
by the speech pathologist
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com