Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(23)
By the same proof as that of (2) in case (i), we have (4.5).
By the same proof of (4.21) we can show that (4.32).
By the same proof as the one above, we have q ˆ ∈ F ( S ) ∩ MEP.
By the same proof as in Case 1, we obtain that (3.65).
Then, by the same proof as in the first part of Lemma 2.2, one gets.
By the same proof as the one above, we have x ˆ ∈ F ( T ) ∩ ( A + B ) − 1 0.
Similar(37)
By using the same proof as Theorem 3.2, we can easily obtain the following conclusions.
By using the same proof of Theorem 1, we show the existence of optimal controls.
The converse of Theorem 1.4 is also valid by following the same proof of Theorem 1.2.
By using the same proof, we obtain that and are nonexpansive.
In addition, the stability of the pinning-based consensus algorithm defined in (4) also can be ensured by using the same proof.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com