Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Table 1 shows the number of persons examined in the main study and those receiving a repeat examination by the reference examiner by select characteristics.
The key findings were identified as follows by the reference examiner: pericardial effusion (3 examinations), pleural effusion (4), ascites (4), abdominal lymph nodes (7), and focal splenic lesion (4).
Approximately 9%% (n = 49) of the enrolled 574 MA users received a repeat dental caries and periodontal examination conducted by the reference examiner.
All patients were re-examined on the same day by the reference examiner (T.H).
There were two instances of discrepant findings: abdominal lymph nodes were not detected by the participant in one patient; and pericardial effusion was reported by the participant but not by the reference examiner in one patient.
In an effort to minimize differences in examination findings, data from each standardization round were reviewed for inconsistencies and findings were discussed with the trainee examiners led by the reference examiner.
Similar(54)
The senior of the two examiners served as the reference examiner.
The reference examiner for this study (BD), who is also the trainer and reference examiner for the current NHANES, trained and calibrated the other three dental examiners.
Overall, examiners from Site A were more in concordance with the reference examiner when assessing dental caries and examiners from Site B were more in concordance with the reference examiner when assessing periodontal disease.
There was high concordance between the reference examiner and the site examiners for identification of untreated dental disease (Kappa statistic values: 0.57 0.75, percent agreement 83 88 %).
In a subsequent calibration phase, the reference examiner and dental examiners repeated dental and periodontal assessments in the same set of 12 volunteers.
More suggestions(15)
by the bankruptcy examiner
by the reference frame
by the reference group
by the reference flow-cell
by the reference phase
by the reference cantilever
by the reference laboratory
by the reference rater
by the reference code
by the reference surface
by the reference mapping
by the reference point
by the reference standard
by the reference genome
by the reference structure
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com